To be sure: Social Justice as a idea is good. It’s the implementation of which I am critical because it seems that enemies of America are using it to destabalize society, while setting us up for a Leninist cultural revolution after economic catastrophe.
We must assert that the change in society is oriented towards acceptible progress and that there is an acceptable rate of change. In other words, the social darwinism of which you are so critical is essentially gradient descent for society and we must be sure that these mechanisms orient us in the correct direction: on a path towards social justice in America. However, too much instability threatens everything and, in fact, threatens to bring all your precious social justice tumbling down on top of all Americans – if it is not done so in a stable, responsible, fair manner.
I believe that the strides made in the last half of the twentienth century represent more progress than this generation could truly ever hope to achieve. Though you are certainly not wrong to try, please, step back and put this all in perspective: what if what you are doing actually – in how it sociophysically plays out – threatens what so many generations before you suffered so hard for to achieve?
Regardless: Social Justice is such a loaded term and I hate loaded terms because you can’t tell what baggage someone is going to pick and choose to include in the frame by which they use to evaluate your statements. Ever read Rhetoric by Aristotle? I haven’t, but I did go to Toastmasters. People are just going to evaluate what you say firstmost with the emotional associations to the words and terms you use, not with the actual clear, intellectual meanings intended.
Unfortunately, to win the game of rhetoric and thus politics, you must first appeal to those emotional associations. You can only hope that someone will listen to you long enough to intellectually digest your content if you satiate their emotional needs and that is assuming that someone has the intellectual wherewithal to understand what your saying. No offense, but for me, there are like 300 people on earth who could understand everything I write on my blog without doing much research – though this counts for nothing to marxists’scum. Regardless, I hardly hope that anyone is listening today, but maybe tomorrow they’ll understand what it was that I was trying to say the entire time, but only if I write.
That you must appeal to emotional associations is especially true when your audience has a need to believe what you’re saying is usually false and should never be believed. For me, that last one happens to the be the case because of this scapegoat witchhunt, in which all sides have apparently invested so many of their marbles. If people don’t want to listen and what you’re saying goes over their heads, there’s basically no hope. Munch on those soundbytes, assholes, and that goes for both the left and the right because you’re both pretty much the same to me: wrong enough to stall out any true progress.
Who do we have to thank for that? The Deep State. The American political system itself is a carefully calculated false dichotomy that cancels out any true progress forward and this is by design.
Whatever you do, Social Justice Warriors, do not let society take the opposite path. That is the paramount danger of your quasi-leninist destabalizaion. We’ve made progress, but now we must actually work together. All Americans and all of humanity. If we cannot do this, we will inevitably degrade into war, conflict, misery and unjust subjugation.
What Is Leninism And Why Is It Intolerable? Hear The Answer From Chomsky Himself
No, this is NOT a reference to the book “To Kill A Mockingbird.”
What is Operation Mockingbird? Imagine being in a stadium of 10,000 people and, every 10 seconds, half of those people shout the same, single word once. Almost like the nauseating Occupy Wall Street technique for circumventing regulations preventing them from speaking with megaphones at protests. Operation Mockingbird is an attempt to use subversive tactics to get journalists and well-connected people to say the same thing, so you’re all swimming in a sea of disinformation. It was used responsibly in the period of time after the end of WW2.
Now that we have social media, something like this program, without being intended, essentially runs on its own with zero direction, oversight or intent from any American authorites. You see: the poor have more power today than they have ever had, but the truth is that they still don’t necessarily have the education they need to properly discern how they should exercise this power. This is horrible because we need people more than ever to be more educated.
There’s something that I really want to set straight and I thought I did that with this post and this post AND this post – but then I’ve realized that I’ve been all sooo censured the whole time. Being falsely labelled as racist or anything is horrible – especially when it involves triggering people with “A/B testing” and hiring gypsy crystal-ball fortune tellers to interpret the facial expressions and changes in body language.
And you’re the athiest, science-freaks? Figures. It’s a marxist. Everyone calm down, it’s just the marxists and they’re about to go full-Lenin. They’ve been doing this shit since well before the Bolshevik revolution.
It was so effective, they invented Leninism. Apparently, that guy came out of nowhere – from some unknown town in Switzerland writing essays no one ever read – straight to swoop in and co-opt the Bolshevik revolution. No one saw it coming.
You want to know what I think about something? Ask me. Have you tried that? Do I look like someone who wants to lie? Or maybe I’m just someone who’s tired of being victimized who simply wants to set shit straight. Ask someone a straight-up question, even if that person is awkward. Jordan Peterson said the funniest thing the other day: “Awkward people are way more interesting that you are.” Yeh, I’m paraphrasing, but stop acting like I’m boring.
I really don’t think any of this is OK – being considered racist or actually being racist (I’m not, by the way) – but I think that it far is worse to falsely label someone, never giving them the chance to explain themselves. While specifically minimizing any chance they have to fight back or to ever even know what they’ve been labeled as. Why are these people trying so hard anyways? Ever thought about that?
They act like conversation and interaction is as bad as exposure to a viral pathogen. No, conversation and interaction is how people resolve problems, so they don’t become worse over time. What happens when you don’t resolve tension that’s building up, choosing to containerize it and ignoring it?
For physical systems, energy always manifests its paths through matter and space via the pathways of least resistance. If there is incredibly high resistance almost everywhere, but that tension just keeps accumulating. There are similar parallels to sociophysical systems. The tension doesn’t go away. Yeh, you might be able to brainwash it or subject it to coercion until it develops Stockholm Syndrome. However, for social systems, this is worse. It still didn’t go away, you just aren’t aware of it. You’re not letting signals in or out, which means you aren’t getting information about that thing that you thought was so dangerous.
What if you and your cronies are what’s dangerous? What if the danger is thinking that you can lock people in sociophysical isolation, until they rot or develop Stockholm Syndrome. All actions have consequences: when people that have been targeted like that finally figure out what’s going on – whether they developed Stockholm Syndrome or not – they’re not going to be very happy. Gee, I guess you can just monitor them for life, then, huh? What if the actual danger is not being capable of getting signals from sources you consider to be threats or muting all similar signals via systemic social media censorship? I guess it’s just a moot point then, if @jack can just censor anyone the American Marxist Mob tells him to.
What you intend matters. What do you intend to create? Are you knowledgable and wise enough to know what you should intend? Do you have accurate information about the situation and the consuences of interaction with it? Those things you did not anticipate the need to intend may or may not be created by forces you can’t control, but what you intend or intend not manifests itself into the world. That certainly is within your control.
No, Really, I’m Asking For A Friend: He’s A Weakass Gangstalking Piece of Shit Like All Of You Wall And I Really Want To Shut Him The Fuck Up.
The problem for me has been, in order to fight back against defamation by false label, I have to acknowledge the label. If you’ve ever seen someone else get into a conversation about “not being a racist” – how do those conversations go? Regardless of the accuracy of the assertion, does that accused/inferred racist ever vindicate themselves? No, they don’t and there’s nothing inherently wrong about that. Minorities have every right to let you know what they feel about the racial undertones of something you said. The problem is that, regardless, the person on the other end can’t really say anything that doesn’t end up digging them in further.
That’s fine. For me? I just end up listening. I want the other person to know that I want to listen to what they have to say because I can’t actually say that I have the opinion or perspective of a minority. Thus, any information helps and I don’t really want to dig myself in further.
Therefore, I usually just respond to all assertions, direct or indirect, with a null response where I listen. I’m not going to give you a subconscious response: I’ve learned to suppress those subconscious responses, since the aforementioned gypsy bitch is helping get people fired over that shit with her cracked up crystal ball.
If you falsely label me as racist, I’m not going to respond – in fact, I think that you would act on such invisible and false labels is itself prejudiced. Specifically because I’ve dealt with this mistreatment, I do not accept what other people say about anyone and specifically statements which would set information in the contextual frame used for future interactions with them. Instead, if anything, I specifically look for the opposite of what you try to imply by suggesting labels to me for another person.
I believe that poisoning the frame to disrupt someone’s open mind is one of the worst things that you can do to someone besides trying to tell their story for them. I have probably done this incidentally, but if I’ve ever done so without giving you the chance to know what I said and respond, then I apologize. Please correct me, if I’m not censured.
Apparently, for all your knowledge of subconscious reactions and facial expressions, you just cant’t get it through your heads that I’m not racist – why? Because your most radical leadership needs it to be true or at least needs you to believe that it is true. Otherwise, the house of cards they built falls apart and that looks real bad.
How’d You Figure That Anyways? Must Be The Smarts. Have We Ever Met?
When people assume that it must be true, are they going to bring it up in conversation? NO! No one’s going to talk about it. Well, if i have to do that to fight back, then it means I end up looking like I’m on “that side” … well, i’m not on the racists’ side and I never will be, which means that they don’t really want me either, if you think about it. And have you ever spent time around people you have to incessently remind: “Don’t be racist!” while wagging your finger. How is that? Is it fun? Is it something you want to do all the fucking time? NO! Racism and anti-semitism are intolerable, but what is worse is the race-baiting for political expediency.
Because people like me are falsely labeled about something we can’t talk about and then people in society generally distance themselves, at best. At worst, individuals in society begin to think “Hey, that guys a racist. Maybe it’s not so bad.” – all the while, It’s a conversation topic that just never fucking comes up. To make everything worse, this occurs at a time where society has decided to weaponize psychology, sociology, hypnosis and NLP. Mass communications have become decentralized. It’s now full of peer-to-peer communication channels that are generally low-bandwidth: mostly textual communications, which are perfect for that marxist gypsy to cause other people to misinterpret the reactions – WHICH IS EXACTLY HOW METHODOLOGICAL MAGICK WORKS YOU IDIOTS! It’s evil!
Your Essentially “Divining” Whether Someone Is Racist Via Triggers & Codewords, Without Understanding How “Locution” Can Be Abused
The techniques that have been used on me blow my mind. They are incomprehensibly complex, but what is even more mystifying is that someone thought, against Occam’s Razor, that any of this could even work. They only did this because they were confident in their ability to mitigate the situation without regard for how it might specifically develop.
Read a book on category theory and get back to me when you figure out how to induce monoidal response patterns for encouraging anyone’s statements and responses to be misinterpreted by everyone. You don’t actually have to understand category theory to learn how to do this, by the way. Anyone who is not socially vulnerable or who is successful with conversation must understand these things, intuitively. They just can’t methodically explain them. I can because that was the only way I was ever going to learn how to understand what was happening to me.
A decade or more of informational conflict always preceeds sociopolitical, civil or military conflict. It’s in the years before the actual conflict that the seeds are being sown to create options for leaders to use later own when the conflict actually becomes obvious. Regardless of whether that leadership is organized, decentralized or even anonymized, This helps them influence the course of narratives, sift to find strikingly emotionally relevant events, and tune the action of the people to filtrate their bases of support. All of this is, by design, very difficult to observe as its happening because otherwise, those in power will simply defuse the issues. This concept of sowing seeds is especially important for civil conflicts, like revolution or expected collapse.
Over the past two decades, the left and the right are incessantly belligerating, which is hardly new. That’s politics, however, this has become unacceptable. People who aren’t racist and aren’t trying to hunt down racists like animals either, but also want to be able to support their own political ideology without falsely being labelled racist, smeared at work, etc by social justice warriors operating righteously because they authentically think they are doing what is right.
Well, you’ve got good intentions, but you’re wrong. I’m not racist. I never was. I never will be. I was falsely labelled and someone indirectly asked you to target me and shows you some chopped and screwed audio clip or some shit and now you’re attacking me with all the righteousness and vitreousity of Joan d’Arc. You know what I am? FUCKING PISSED OFF. At who? White, liberal America.
And They Wonder Why I Have Trust Problems
“Good day, ‘American’ asexualized-incel, booked(?) racist bag o’shit, would you like to have the only conversation with a woman you’ve never met that you’ll ever have in America to last more than five minutes? Good! Tell me all your secrets, we’re going to destroy you. It’s definitely not a trap. It will be used to neurologically torture you for the rest of your life. Don’t kill yourself immediately; we need to make this a good one. A long one and a good one.”
By the way, it’s amazing how easy it is to correct a misunderstanding with a simple conversation, right? Five eyes are better than one, n’est plus ultra? I’m not talking about a situation that actually happened, of course. No, because if that content was used to victimize me for three years, even by people I don’t know, then I certainly would have heard about it by now, right? Unless … you don’t mean that these people never meant for me to make it this far! And no, i’m not talking about you, honeypots come in all shapes and sizes. Sometimes, I’m pretty sure that one just hadn’t gotten “the memo” about David Conner. The one that says: do not, under any circumstance, allow this person to ever feel like anything more than an abused puppy. We’ve gotten our hands real dirty to make all this wonderful black magick happen. It’s cost us millions and it’d be a real shame if we boarded you, too. Yeh, I’m pretty sure that’s what happened, sometimes, but – again – how the fuck am I supposed to know? Anyways …
She’s Got Gloves Because She Don’t Touch Nothing
I was wondering whether people would try this. It’s so horribly wrong, it’s a tragedy that doesn’t fit on the classic Shakespearean scale for “That’s some reallll fucked up shit, ain’t it?” And that’s kind of the point I was trying to make all along, but would anyone listen? NOPE. Never. Well … occasionally. You could have thrown all the neo-leninist hypnotists that you want at me and it was never going to work.
If I was subjected to all these false-witness crypto-leninist gypsies, why wouldn’t I be pissed off at a specific ethnicity? Or other ethnicities generally? Because it’s not their fault and that is precisely the trap. Instead, this problem speaks deeply about the fallibility of humans in general. Besides, people who are not white and not socialist generally gave me the benefit of the doubt more often than not.
Why is that? Well, there’s a few reasons for that and I’m glad that I was wise enough to be peaceful about being mislabelled. Most people might just lash back at what they thought was the cause of their problems. That means, they weren’t racist before, but then after being falsely labeled, they generally gravitate towards a group of people that accepts them. This is what is infuriating about your dumb “social justice” bullshit when it’s not warranted. You are creating the problem and your more radical leaders know that they are creating the problem.
These radical leninists are lying to you because they know that they can use ethnic tension to make America weaker. They also know how useful this will be in maintaining and perpetuating power after a cultural revolution. Simply use a broad brush and paint all your enemies later on as being racists, if their in the opposition. Many things are not meant to be seen and will not make sense until you look backwards after extrapolating forwards. The more things that seem to line up from such futures past and the more difficult these inferences are to make, the more likely it is that someone has hidden designs. This is how “it’s obvious” – except it’s not. It is certainly not meant to be seen until it was too late.
In the video above, your eyes don’t actually receive a photonic signal until the entanglement via polarization has been resolved with certainty. So you extrapolate to look forward, then look backwards. If you only try to extrapolate with deterministic certainty, you will never figure these things out, which is exactly what these Leninist architects intend. And that is what makes these far-far-leftists so goddamn criminal. They know they must make the bottom fall out and they let their contempted bougeoisie feel comfortably in power until it does.
This is why the leninists want Trump in power, as crazy as that sounds. When everything happens – because they have the advantage of numbers and have belligerently caused so many problems in democratic societies – the poor will do anything they say. After the bottom falls out, the economy will not function again for the poor or the rich, which means money doesn’t mean shit for anyone. Then they get to lash back at Trump and all the “bougeoisie” that he represents.
It’s not Marxism, it’s Leninism. Pray for your precious world revolution empire or that’s the only coffee you’re ever going to drink. Communism is certainly economically unsustainable without “world revolution”, by the way.
Furthermore, leninists will bide their time. They know that they only get one real shot at revolution per generation, absent systemic sociological chaos. Why? Because that’s the flaw that Lenin addressed with Marxism: the rich responded to Marxist revolution by satiating the poor’s desire for higher standard of living – nevermind that this probably had more to do with the industrial revolution and technology than most of the actual response to marxism. At this point, the rich have woken up and clamp down again, only to relax a few decades later … or so the theory goes.
To me, it is all about what you intend to create in society. Almost no leftists would intend to create these problems, but the moreso Leninist architects of this? They’re traitors and if they got away with this stuff, they would have gotten away with it for all time because of the singularity. They are ruining the economy without regard for how that affects our ability to project American and Western power abroad. Why? Because they don’t care that their revolution to create communism essentially revokes any sensible argument for Americans to control the global reserve currency. It’s staring them straight in the face and they wouldn’t even care if the noticed it. Why? Because they’re Marxists at heart: they just make shit up to win and they have the numbers to sociophysically amplify their message to get away with it. The rich do not, especially in the cyber era, even though the rich do have money…
The point is: no ethnicity is the problem. The problem is passive-aggressive, radicalized, political operatives. Why would people of specific ethnicities be less likely to act as social justice warriors or to lash out at people who have only be thinly labelled as racist? Because they know what it’s like to be mistreated and stereotyped. They know the pain.
Why else? because they know that your trust-fund chomping skinny white socialist ass might be wrong. and if someone falsely labeled another who is targeted, that looks reallly bad. it sets race relations back. People who actually respect ethnic issues know this, so they don’t do it. who respects ethnic issues more than anyone? people who have shared in the suffering and progress of those ethnicities. they know what it’s like to be set back and have shared that pain. Sure, you – as a white trust-fund activist – should be applauded for caring about the suffering of others so much you’d spend your trust-fund daddy’s money to get arrested at a protest, which is fine, since the left needs rich people like you to make the more painful sacrifices and to help feed the masses…
You ain’t never gonna be nothing but a custy to them, or something like that. Basically: they’re hoping you might have some money, which is why any power you contribute to their movement will slip away from your fingers if you’re not careful. It is also why you’ll probably find yourself at an informational disadvantage, quite often, especially around your leadership. Just be glad that their revolution hasn’t hit full gear yet because when it does, they’re pretty much done using you, unless you’re willing to carnivously tear apart anything that stands in your way and especially all your wealthy connections.
Even their tactics reek of the same money-grubbing bougeoisie that they hate so much. You just don’t know it yet because you haven’t studied enough. You don’t know what it’s like to plan something like this over the course of decades because you’re so caught up by what you see on MSNBC, ABC, CNN and even FOX to ever watch a fucking lecture. You’re distracted and you are within the system or at least within the system’s disruption and therefore, it’s almost impossible to see it clearly. You need to learn.
To anyone on the left, I implore you to challenge your believes, especially on economics and philosophy. Why not? I learn about my enemy. There is nothing more valuable to me than learning how to dissect my enemy and especially their arguments. I can destroy you with nothing but your own philosophic axioms and foundational beliefs. That is: I can tear your beliefs apart and put them back together with nothing but what you give me, which implies inherent, systemic, tautological fallibility.
And Yet, You Say This Was A Fair Fight? I Hope You Take That Into Account When I Finally Destroy You. You’re Going To Need Something To Remember That Keeps You Down, Communists.
“Like I was ever going to wind a debate with Marxists already exerting near-total influence? You drown out anything you don’t want to hear, like Mockingbird on steroids, since you engage in demagoguery to rile up the masses you know don’t understand economics.” - The Literal Third World American
They Have No Choice But To Endure Pains And Joys of Their Identity. It’s Not Something You Can Turn Off When Your Done Thinking About It.
But, you don’t actually know what it’s like to be African American, Hispanic American or Indian American. Sure, you can imagine what it’s like. you can connect with them. you can protest with them. struggle with them. but, you are never going to be one of them. these people have experienced unfair treatment for their entire life. unfair treatment happens to everyone.
Racism isn’t the problem in america. yes, there are leftover fragments of ethnic tension in america that are sociophysical relics of the variance in the distribution of population, as well as other factors. yes, that’s real, but the true problem is poverty and poverty affects everyone. it doesn’t matter if you’re black, white, yellow or orange with a blond wig. poverty affects everyone and if you don’t recognize the root of the problem, you can’t solve the problem.
Because It Looks Like You’re Using The Poor
If you can’t solve the problem, get the fuck out of the way. I can solve the problem and you’re making it realllly hard. “Detention” => What IS that anyways? Am I stuck in some common core middle school and I don’t even know it? Under who’s authority? Your de facto authority? I don’t think so. If I don’t see a goddamn badge, why should I trust you?
GTFO of Here With Your False Dichotomy Bullshit Anyways. SAME TEAM?!
False Dichotomy: A situation in which two alternative points of views are presented as the only options, whereas others are available.
So, you see. i’m between a rock and a hard place. I don’t actually want to be completely isolated from “both sides” whatever the fuck that means. As far as I am concerned, if one of those sides is the racist side, they can jump off a fucking cliff because I don’t need them and no one does.
But you’d be surprised: Imagine asking a white liberal to identify all the racists from a room full of 10,000 republicans – imagine a Trump rally. Now let’s tweets and social interactions this person had access to, they’d label almost every single one as racist. That’s simply not true. If you asked that same group of people “Are you racist?” yeh, maybe a handful would raise their hands proudly. Now, I’m saying that the rest of those republicans would like those guys to jump off a fucking cliff because they’re making it real hard for the rest of us.
Do you see the fucking problem here? you’re not fighting a in a conflict for “social justice.” You’re unwittingly screening the political opposition for people to systematically disempower, all without truly knowing what’s going on. IT’S A GODDAMN CULTURAL REVOLUTION.
Again, I’ve written about my feelings on ethnic issues before. They figured out that they were wrong, but then they censored my writing. They needed me to look like a racist.
They knew that anyone who actually read what I had to say couldn’t reasonably think that I was racist. They also knew that anyone who interacted with me in an open-minded way couldn’t possibly think I was racist. That is, if I was aloud to act in situtations where in a comfortable setting, interacting normally and not subjected to games designed specifically so I’d fail publicly and spectacularly.
What do I mean by a comfortable setting? what’s my ideal safe space? A motherfucking B-Boy Jam, you assholes. I love hip hope. I loved how it was an amazing vibrant culture that had sprung up in American cities to give people hope by giving them something that belonged to everyone, combining components of cultures worldwide. It had become viral across the world and transformed urban communities everywhere. I became frustrated me when I recognized that some of those elements became overly commercialized.
Now, do you think the people who are influential in the hip hop communities of the four elements want to have anything to do with someone who’s been [falsely] labelled as racist? NO! FUCK NO! So what does that do to me?
Nope, Don’t Nobody Want Nonna That Weak-Ass Decaf
You fucking defamed me with your poison pen – yeh, I’ve made some messed up statements, but they were always very public in a social forum that gives the other person the chance to know who said it and to respond. That is, only if they’re legally permitted to do so without some gag order that says they have to propagate the false labels these psychological eichmenns worked so hard to burden me down with. I’m not proud of everything I’ve done. Hardly. But if you want to say I’m shirking the responsibility of dealing with the consequences of my actions, then why have I been sooo public about everything for so long? Who’s gonna throw that first stone at me? Because I know I’ve got a lot of them coming.
You want to set the record straight? SAY SOMETHING THEN. Otherwise, GTFO of here with that passive aggressive bullshit. And I already know that you’re not going to say anything. You aren’t going to start now, are you? I wish you would. I don’t want to fight anyone or hurt anyone. No, I want to make things better. Tell me how I can do that because otherwise, all I can see is a world that wants to tell me to lock myself in an institution because they can’t handle their own stinky-ass double decker.
You took away hip hop from me, all to isolate me and make me vulnerable. This happened fairly early on, by the way. Around 2010, at least, but at that point, there were just rumors. I know because I had good friends lash out at me and I didn’t know why.
So, what does sociophysical isolation do to someone? It drives them insane, since it is essentially no different than portable solitary confinement. For someone already dealing with Asperger’s and social vulnerability, this can be far more than the straw needed to break a camel’s back.
“Oh, he loves breakdancing? Won’t stop? It provides exercise, cardio and positive social interaction? Perfect! Take it all away.”
What else does it do? Sociophysical isolation allows you to tightly control the social conditions, almost like an “experiment” – which conveniently allows someone to “record” “data” that will no doubt be magically vanished the second someone comes asking for it. How many times has that happened anyways? Grow some fucking balls because right now, it looks like you’re getting your ass handed to you by a five-foot-five retard with zero true friends who makes less money annually than most people do in African nations. Goddamn, Leninists. All they have is passive aggressive bullshit because they know they can’t win a real debate. That doesn’t make you smart, it actually makes you STUPID and WEAK.
Here’s some 1337 H4X0R Income Taxes From 2015
Come Here Often? I Didn’t Think So… Oh, You Do? Tell Me More…
Once someone knows that you’re going to passive-aggressively avoid every interaction, they gain magical powers because they can make you disappear real quick, just by starting a conversation. If you’ve ever been gangstalked, try being friendly with those ironic fucks. You’ll never see someone run away from potential acquaintanceship faster with a more ghastly pale on their face. They’ll never see it coming, which is hilarious: it means they expected you to be completely predictable AND SOCIALLY VULNERABLE UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES. Certainly, never to recover or improve: because THAT was the INTENT, all along, which just goes to show you how important intent and cognizance are.
Let me come feed you some wheaties, bitches. Let’s debate for real, you squarmy, sardonic fucks. Oh? Whats that? I didn’t think so … fucking weak-minded, weak-willed toxic figments of my perpetual social miasma. That is all you will ever be, a sickly little sheep begging someone else to solve your problems.
Here’s One Such Clown That’s A Lot Like A Gangstalker.
One important difference: this guy was standing when he died. Y’all spineless fucks don’t seem to stand for nothing nor nobody either, AFAIK – but how would I know the difference. It’s not like you would actually have a conversation with someone. Scroll all the way down, if you want to imagine me laughing my ass off.
<spits n=”however many you want, bitch. you aint’ gonna do nothing />”
And no, I’m not asking gangstalkers to commit suicide here. That’s one unfortunate clown who’s not gonna take any more cold showers. What I am asking: have a goddamn conversation with a target sometime, if you’re even allowed to do that. I guess it depends on what you know about their psychology, which indicates cognizance, malicious intent [to drive someone to suicide] and the required logistics to unlawfully transmit mental health information about someone without their consent.
And THAT is why you shouldn’t have fucked with someone as intelligent as me. And I’m going to do everything I can to make you pay because anyone else who’s been through this would NOT be able to stand up for themselves. If you can admit to many how many people have been through this, I’ll know what a proportional response is and when to stop. Until then, pick out a real good Hallmark Card for me because you’re going to need it.
Tengu Test? YOU FAIL
Again, I’m sorry for creating these problems, but I dare you & implore you to help me stop this, instead of attempting to use it for pragmatic political expedience! Who could be the first to do that without they themselves becoming targeted? Who thought to ever give me the chance to deal with the consequences of what I allegedly created?