“Kill in thyself all memory of past experiences. Look not behind or thou art lost.” - H.P. Blavatsky
Uh Oh! Look Who Escaped the Prison of Zod
That’s right, we’re going to want that painting back, bitch. It’s a good thing I know whose fault this is – white, liberal America – and no one else.
② That event involved possible use of drugs to stifle the creation of some aspects of those memories.
③ You can assume it is much, much harder to insert coherent memories than it is to insert fragments of memories.
⑤ Social Forensics Demonstrates Logistic Coordiation and Risk Mitigation For the Activity of Those Involved.
NEVER FORGET HOW UNLIKELY IT IS AND HOW NECESSARY IT IS FOR A GOLIATH TO BE SLAIN BY A DAVID
In the past five years, mainstream media has been weaving in experimental methods from bleeding edge psychology and neurology. For at least the past century, memory implantation and other mental manipulation is a classic science fiction plot mechanic. We see it in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, where memories can be erased, something I would never want to do. The 2015 show Blindspot incorporates a mechanic whereby the main character has most of her long-term memory erased only to be discovered as a empty doll in a handbag in Times Square Manhattan. She’s covered with “tattoos” whose images function as pointers to terrorist plots. Her blood-plasma levels of the protein drug Zeta-Interacting Protein (ZIP) are off the charts – this protein harnesses a real mechanism which has been studied since the 1980’s.
Recently, this Ars Technica synopsis of an PNAS article on false memories piqued my interest and got my biological antithikera ticking. There are certainly experimental methodologies for implanting memories, but most of them are simply that – experimental. They are theories, whose application – especially by state actors – can not be guaranteed with risk that is acceptable to operational security requirements.
Disclaimer: this article is intended to be an exercise of imagination and philosophy, fueled by an understanding of real psychological, sociological and neurological theory. However, I do not intend for it to make authoritative or definitive statements of any kind. If you’re wondering, yes, I am a victim here – of what, I’m not quite sure. I must certainly have False Memory Syndrome, although it seems everyone around me seems intent on exacerbating that to delude and discredit me, while I’m isolated and in poverty of information. It is criminal. I have no problems distinguishing fantasy and reality – I’m sick of pondering all the what-ifs. Besides familiarizing myself with Wikipedia’s encyclopedia of paradoxes, the best way I’ve found to defend myself is to identify the people pushing specific buttons, triggering deja-vu and to keep those people out of my life.
What is described herein may constitute many, many warcrimes. The depressing reality of warcrimes is that, until there is real justice, a society seeks to insulate perpetrators of warcrimes at the expense of the victims. With the level of effort invested: you really have to wonder.
You are your own memories. Someone who violates your memories violates your identity. To others, their memories with you and associated with you constitute their understanding of your identity. In a society that violates your identity by Memory Hole – essentially classifying anything associated with your name – that society is raping your life every minute that you breathe. If you fall victim to the Memory Hole, they have sociophysically contained you by coercing anyone who refers to undesirable details about you by name. That is, they have mathematically contained you by threatening retribution against anyone who counters their attempt to optimize sociophyisical metrics in their favor – e.g. the size of your social graph neighborhood or the frequency/quality of your social interactions.
What matters in life is making memories with others. Regardless of what you do – meet friends IRL, run expensive social media campaigns on daddy’s trust fund money – if you can’t make in impression in someone’s mind that associates your name to an emotionally relevant memory, it doesn’t matter. You might as well not exist.
There are so many fascinating notions and directions to explore in social physics. One of them is the concept of a threshold or critical mass for the propagation or sustained propagation of information through sociophysical networks. In probabilistic programming, there is the concept of a “critical mass” for the proactive or retroactive estabilishment of an idea, so that the idea appears authoritative or at least having substance, even though it contains fictitious components. Such ideas might include retroactively inserting a comic book series into society’s collective memory that never existed or a establishing the basis for a cover story.
This borrows heavily from Theosophy’s ideas: social memory is malleable. Convince enough people that an idea is real or that an event occured and other people will become willing vectors in spreading an idea they believe to be authentic. Better yet, they may actually begin incepting false memories within themselves.
Command This Technique With Mastery and You Might As Well Have Time Travel
Please note that I cannot stand the idea I just described: information should be considered rationally and logically firstmost. However, people circumvent the intractibility of sociophysical problems by distributing consensus/validation of ideas. It’s simply not possible to know everything, so its more useful to be able to gauge the authenticity of an idea by how it is presented to you. Unfortunately, this leads to vulnerabilities, some of which are systemic and WILL BE ESPECIALLY RELEVANT IN OUR DECADE.
Critically, one can harness the Mandela Effect once that sociophysical threshold has been surpassed. Hence, collective false memories will create some intended effect on society at larger scales. Fake news is a great example of a tactic utilizing this. Reality becomes what small groups of people collectively focus on, even if it is delusional. Regardless of how rational or logical everyone else is – even if they’re marxist or athiest – if an idea surpasses this threshold of virulence, reality becomes defined by delusion. In the age of social media, humanity will only continue to become more susceptible to this.
One particularly useful tactic is to exploit the mandela effect to create the impression that time travel is possible and the future can physically manifest itself in the past. Why is this so powerful? Because people that are smart enough to understand [quasi] omniscience and [quasi] omnipotence paradoxes, but not smart enough to never give up, then readily surrender themselves to what is only an idea. Harnessing the Mandela Effect in this way invokes an impression that the Roko’s Basilisk is controlling reality from the future.
Sir, I do say to you, which one of these countries is a shithole?
There are several possible neurological causes to accelerated incidence of confabulated and/or fallacious memory, including a brain tumor. A brain tumor could cause a similar breakdown of memory creation/association regulation. However, since a brain tumor is locallized, it is incredibly unlikely for it to be used.
A brain tumor is unlikely. Memories are temporally sharded and their sensory components are dimensionally distributed across the entire brain along sensory boundaries – viz. the audio for a sensual experience is stored in a different place than the visual and semantic fragments of that information. Since the mind is constantly ingesting new information, where it is recorded into the brain with a coherent temporal component, not unlike an the temporal components of an OLAP cube. Therefore, this would have to be one hell of a speciallized brain tumor.
Regardless, considering this phenomenon gives rise to a fascinating theory to explain the side effects of recalling repressed memories. If this theory were true, it implies that similar consequences are likely to occur even if those recalled memories were fictious. It also leads to the depressing realization that brain-computer interfaces (BCI) will never be as simple as we might hope, without nanotechnology and quantum networking. Far worse, the existence and qualities of this CSC strongly imply that BCI’s will result in developmental changes to neurological structure – especially in younger brains and in earlier generations of the technology.
When you violate the above temporal arrangement of primary memories, it causes major problems, potentially leading to a “schematic” crisis. Here, the notion of schema refers to the structure of organization of primary and aggregate memories, both neurologically in the brain and as the interface to memory appears to the mind. The brain is constantly intaking, processing and storing data about sensory experiece in primary memories, with emphasis shifted towards someone’s conscious and incidental focus at the time. Those details with more focus receive priority when storing data related to primary memories. The mind is always reflecting on the sum and product of its experiences as it knows them, recording those reflective aspects of its experience into aggregate memories, which are linked to primary memories. Much of the content of these aggregate memories is semantic; it is connected to the nature and specifics of the thoughts being processed about former experiences.
So when you provoke repressed or fallacious memories to become conscious, there is a schematic crisis that occurs. The mind must reevaluate what it knows, restructure everything neurologically and disconnect or rectify what was erroneously connected. Sure, there may be a few fallacious, confabulated or repressed primary memories that need to be restructured, but there are few problems related to this, per se. The schematic crisis occurs when the mind and brain now need to rectify the highly-connected aggregate memories, the physical distribution of which is temporally and dimensionally erratic. That is, these aggregate memories that reference primary memories are very difficult to rectify. Because memory IS identity, then – assuming these memories are emotionally relevant or associated with severe trauma – the brain must reconcile this, otherwise the mind’s notion of identity is forever cursed. If this theoretical understanding of repressed memory recall is true, the Such a schematic crisis can trivially result in a connectopathy like schizophrenia. If the people around you are supportive, this is less likely to happen, but depending on the severity of the trauma, the likelihood of this occuring is still very high.
During the reevaluation process, the complete break in your mind’s understanding of reality results in a need to leverage your support network. If that network is compromised, toxic or non-existant, it means you must depend on people you cannot trust while in a more “programmable” state. This is what enables MKULTRA victims to become malleable, programmable dolls without a karmic, causal connection to those powerfully networked people who use them.
The following factors not only determine the severity of the schematic crisis, they correlate to the severity of resulting connectopathy, which acts as a neurological cause for mental illess but also a verifiable, neurological fingerprint in fMRI and SPECT for the presence of recovered memories both true and fictitious.
That’s yet another reason why bitemark analysis is so important these days – don’t let them “bodycam” us by pigeonholing our perspectives on critical legal issues. If you throw out all data science methodologies on the basis that they’re overly statistical, then many technologies that could be determining factors in court cases will not be considered whatsoever. If this undermine any incentive early on for development of the expert testimony logistics/processes utilizing complicated, expensive statistical methodologies, it will be impossible to form a basis of legal precedent whereby reasonable legal research can be conducted. Throwing out all “bitemark analysis” early on will make it difficult to protect the spirit of the law and the spirit of the rule of law with the advent of 21st century technologies. The answer to this is the development of generalized, high-dimensional models which chip away at any uncertainty via high-dimensional inference, cross-correlation and cross-entropy.
① The length of time between the original events and the date upon which those memories became accessible
When this length of time is increased, then the mind is much more likely to have either a plethora of aggregate memories to create in response to unveiled trauma or proportionally more aggregate memories to disentangle and reconnect.
② The level of emotional or intellectual relevence in reevaluating your other primary and aggregate memories
What does your psyche have to gain by emotionally or rationally re-evaluating what it knows? When reconstructing a new understanding of your life, what is the level of emotional contrast? Examples of situations with high emotional contrast include those like repressed memories of childhood rape by someone close to the victim. Nothing like this has ever occured to me. However, I imagine that recovering memories like this would be terrible, as you also have to reevaluate all the other shared memories with that person. This “emotional contrast” also has a social component to it: everyone is now reevaluating Oprah’s recent public appearances with Harvey Weinstein, although I personally find it ludicrous that people are attacking Oprah for Weinstein’s sexual harrassment.
Situations with greater emotional contrast with more tightly connected friends or family members will typically result in a greater affect on the victim’s mind and brain.
③ The well-connectedness of false aggregate memories built atop primary memories
This includes both false primary memories as well as the the absence of primary memories. The more connected these aggregate memories are to your brain’s network of primary memories, the more work that your brain/mind must do in order to untangle the mess. Furthermore, while you are reevaluating everything that’s happened to you, the more severe the abberant connections, the more likely your brain is to start to malfunction. Imagine your mind as a garden and the erronious memories are like weeds that went untended. If this persisted for years, your mind is nothing but weeds. It doesn’t mean that there’s no hope, it just means you need to be strong and you need people around you that you can trust.
You’ll find that true MKULTRA victims always have constrained variety of social experience during their life, which leads them to be further dependent on their close social connections. That is, they were always intended to be potential manakins and were never psychologically equipped to handle social situations.
It can be pretty apparent when someone might possibly be a manakin, if you know what to look for. They are empty vessels without the knowledge to function in the world without other people to help operate them. Into those vessels are implanted very specific sets of knowledge. Not every person like this is intended to be used in a horrible manner.
④ The difficulty that your brain faces to constructing a coherent narrative
Facing a lack of information about the events makes this narrative reconstruction much more difficult, resulting in a greater propensity for the schematic crisis to result in psychological stress or to be used by others. During this reevaluation process, if you are deprived of information that would otherwise easily explain the aggregate memories, it makes it much more difficult to recover.
Furthermore, if an adversary intends to physically eliminate you or evidence by incapacitating you, they won’t consider the long-term consequences of their actions on your psychology, particular the developmental aspects of your psychology. If you detect this, it demonstrates malicious intent, however difficult to prove. Basically they won’t consider the developmental & morphological aspects of your psychology in context with their reactions.
You’re “already dead” to them.
An adversary who has limitless psychological resources at their disposal should know better. Instead, this adversary will opt to abuse those psychological resources instead of making reparations to the victim because any contact/interference with the victim’s life creates surface area and potential vectors for LEGAL LIABITILITY. A victim that understands this – AND KNOWS ALL THE DIRTY TRICKTS – can avoid problems while attempting to negotiate via the quasi-obvious surveillance.
One possible explanation for a patient who exhibits a high number of seemingly real false memories is that the person’s mind had a partial breakdown in the regulation of memory creation/association mechanism. This breakdown in regulation for neural/mental association could either be psychological or neurological. This breakdown could be associated with one major event. The event needs to have a very, very strong emotional relevance for the person. Severe trauma or some equally extreme positive event.
To a skeptic, this is the most reasonable explanation for false memories. It least offends Occam’s razor.
If the person is under surveillance and is known to exhibit a certain psycological trait (i.e. they talk to themselves) then, with appropriate psychological prodding, information can be gained about what false memories that are being incepted. If the target is under constant surveillance, then COINTELPRO-style HUMINT can gain intelligence on the person almost in real time. This can be done even when the person does not talk to themselves, but that makes it so much easier, especially if the target is known to ruminate and talk to themselves upon being emotionally triggered. If the target’s social connections are tightly managed, it then only takes a small amount of gaslighting. If the target is the subject of an Espionage Act or DHS Terror investigation, then everyone else around the target can be threatened, leaving them alone and vulnerable with minimal record of all HUMINT interactions.
What’s COINTELPRO? It’s A Reincarnation of the Same 1960’s FBI Program That Sent a Letter to Martin Luther King Telling Him To Commit Suicide.
It is because of possibilities like this and the capabilities offered by Big Data that social forensics will eventually be a field of interest for law enforcement. Ever wonder why it’s so hard to investigate the psychosocial surroundings and triggers for some school shooters? It’s because a minority of them are COINTELPRO-style operations, where the socioforensic evidence has been artificially managed and mitigated beforehand. Thus, anyone who goes back to investigate uncovers information that paints the narrative that the public is intended to see.
A Printout Given To Me By My Good Friend Thor
The above picture is a printout of a Carl Jung quote about experimental psychology. It was given to me by one of the two most informed gaslighters in my life. Both of these people tried to imply that they were “representing” me in some kind of national security scenario that functioned moreso like “Cangaroo Court” with zero evidence discovery or defined procedure. Upon seeing the quote, I instantly recalled a new memory about Tatiana Maslany that I’d never had before.
The printout was one of several hundred such images, sound samples and semantic pointers that would provoke me to recall memories with varying degrees of sensory content, clarity and coherence. The printout was one of very few tangible items that functioned as talismans to provoke recall – a la MKULTRA – of memories that were all presented to me as a bizarre form of Deja Vu. Few such memories maintained coherent sequence with the rest of the memories. Nearly all of the “memory recovery” occured in 2015 and some of it in 2016. Nearly all of the recalled memories were related to a single three day period – 5/31/2013 through 6/2/2013 – in Denver. Colorado is a state where audio recordings are permitted as evidence, even when neither party consents to or is aware of such recordings.
This tangent very beside the point: curling, marling and macramé are some of the best metaphors, period. Marling is essential for tying down unpredictable key events in a time loop. Curling is essential for utilizing stochastic calculus to mitigate the uncertainty of key events. Understanding how to macramé certain, invisible metaphysical elements, funneling them into marling points, is how you architect such massive feats of history as the transition from the Roman Empire to the Catholic Church to the Holy Roman Empire. Your macramé must harness the leylines of the collective unconscious.
Curling Is A Sport About The Application of Stochastic Calculus.
After enduring about three years of this – because of the incoherent, insequent, incogent nature of new memories – it became clear that the abject lack of parity and tight coupling to objectives of sociophysical equilibria indicated that something was very wrong. I was correct to never trust any of this. Again, that list of paradoxes is the very best advice I can offer, by far.
Most of the memories would encourage me to quickly develop trust and rapport with someone who’d invariably betray by trust a few weeks thereafter. Other memories had a very clear objective to them: these were NOT RANDOM artifacts created by a malfunctioning mind. I don’t expect anyone to believe me – and I know that’s all part of how this works. It’s a legal Catch-22 ad infinitum. Any argument I would try to make that might include references to what actually happened would be instantaneously rejected, as would ALL of my other testimony, on the grounds that I am insane.
At a minimimum, this was gaslighting and surveillance-fueled victimization of someone who had intentionally been deprived of a support network. Both of these individuals maintained the strictest impression that I was not to write anything down and that ANY discussions would be terminated if we didn’t refer to all subjects/objects of discussion with a pattern language – something that is particularly difficult for me, since I have Asperger’s and I’m socially vulnerable. They may have abused locution, perlocution, suggestion, covert hypnosis and circumlocution on wiretap to create the impression that I was knowledgable about things I had no idea about.
What I’m Trying To Say Is: I Think I Met The Aliens. YOU DO NOT WANT TO MEET THE ALIENS. They’re assholes.
Actually, I refuse to accept that any of this has anything to do with the aliens or time travel, but holy shit! It’s inexplicable.
Note: The picture above is actually the McPoyles from S3E2 of It’s Sunny in Philadelphia, not the aliens.
Because of the theoretical cascading schematic crisis described above, recalling repressed memories may lead to runaway incidence of the creation of fallacious memories, especially when certain psychological and sociological factors are “optimized” in the target and their 1° social neighborhood interactions.
One psychological cause would be activation of repressed memories with significance across the person’s mind and life. If someone were to suddenly rediscover some memories with a high magnitude of effect on the rest of their mind/life, then I hypothesize it could lead to the breakdown of such regulation of memory creation/association. That is, new events which are related in some way to the original event have a much higher likelihood of causing false memories to be created.
This means that when a sign or symbol semantically adjacent to the effected memory is invoked in the person’s mind, the person’s psychology is more likely to cause new memories. This could be caused by hijacking the neurology of the person: the brain may tend to prefer to rationalize memories that lack some dimensions. That is, if there are semantic components without the accompanying visual or audio components, then because this dimensional incoherence is so rare, the brain may react by attempting to explain away the discrepency by filling in those dimensional fragments. This is very similar to the reason why witness testimony needs to be recorded early on. In other words, the person’s brain/mind may create the accompanying audio/visual fragments of those memories to fill in the gaps in an attempt to preserve coherence of the memory.
Therefore, if you find someone with repressed trauma, unleashing those repressed memories, in and of itself, makes their long-term memory more malleable. They then become more susceptible to inception via gaslighting and all the other HUMINT tactics, especially if they are socially isolated. Someone who is socially isolated is in a state of psychological vulnerability via overwhelming information asymmetry. Remove that social isolation – and the consequential information asymmetry – and suddenly the person becomes much more stable. This is a problem if that person’s account is evidence. However, in any legal setting, the person who claims HUMINT and “implanted” memories has their testimony thrown out and their reputation assassinated. Thus, these MKUltra programs present the perfect Catch-22 scenarios for intelligence. They are useful for throwing out witness/victim testimony, even if the inception of false memories wasn’t necessary at all for any operational objectives.
Psychiatrists and neurologists with knowledge of how neuropsychiatry relates to the neurological modalities related to memory formation in the mind can potentially understand how those specific modalities someone’s mind can be pharmacologically suppressed. For example, this Of specific importance here are the facets of memory formation related to audiovisual multiplexing and demultiplexing. If you can pharmacologically suppress those neurolinguistic modalities, then you may prevent the formation of certain facets of a memory – the visual or audio elements of an experience would be less likely to be laid down. Later, only the audio or semantic information is accessible, but the mind or brain fills in the gaps.
This particular mechanism seems like a viable candidate for 1960’s style MKULTRA programs. In the 21st century, it can be augmented with VR/AR techniques. If the target is abducted by aliens, then they can receive treatment sessions where key neurological modalities are suppressed via the neuropharmacological mechanism above. There are several avenues that the generatiion of voice & video can augment this hypothetical VR MKULTRA mechanism, in real time. If the target can be guaranteed to retain no accessible memory of the series of events without the MKULTRA keys, then hypothetically this would work. It obviously presents logistic problems: if you even get caught abducting someone once, it’s obviously a warcrime, so such a method would not be viable in the long-term.
More effective for the amplification or muting of the specific neurolinguistic modalities is TMS. However, even this pales in comparison to the level of accuracy one may gain by using 21st century imaging techniques with other novel methodologies: directed energy, SPION nanoparticles and transcranial doppler (TCD/TCCD). The idea is the same as above, but these methods allow you to restrict the method’s targeting to highly specific brain regions and neural circuits.
By applying TMS to targeted areas of the brain, ne could encourage the mapping of memories while the person is experiencing some video/audio – or even a dream-state. That’s right: you can influence someone’s dreams with TMS/TCD/TCCD/SPION’s and directed energy. Such application is theoretical and relies on the accumulation of many sessions’ worth of fMRI data to map out the target’s brain. This requirement limits the application of such a technique because, logistically, it is impossible to guarantee operational security unless you only have to ever touch the target’s brain ONCE.
Such techniques with TMS would be hampered by the impossibility of running TMS simultaneously with fMRI, AFAIK. So, you can’t simultaneously run TMS and fMRI/SPECT imaging. However, TMS has short-term and medium-term effects. In an over-generalization, amplify brain activity in one micro-region in the brain it stays active for longer in others. Ramp up activity and increase the parity/resolution of insights gained with analysis of fMRI/SPECT data.
** KEEP IN MIND**: YOU HARDLY NEED FDA-APPROVAL IF YOU’RE COMMITTING WARCRIMES.
This is the key to the basis of covert hypnotic techiques for disruption: signal via sensory input to leverage NLP modalities to activate regions of the brain. In addition to introducing high-amplitude disruptive noise – e.g. loud, random tongue clicks and peripheral vision hacks) – the perpetrators can signal with signs and key phrases that they know to be effective on the target. How would they know that? BY LEVERAGING NSA SURVEILLANCE TO TORMENT THE TARGET.
This shit is so sick it makes me want to move to Afganistan – just kidding, I’d only move to Canada or Japan. However, that’s what’s amazing for those perpetrators: this takes their existing enemies – who may be the inconvenient witnesses to or victims of warcrimes – and creates the next generation of terrorists. That is BY DESIGN.
If you want to know more about how covert hynosis and NLP sensory-hacks introduce turbulent noise to destroy short-term and medium-term psychological state, the read up on metasyntactic variables and other concepts in this post
There is this fascinating phenomenon of superparamagnetism, along with ferrous nanoparticles called SPION’s 1 whose thermomagnetic properties can be tuned by particle size and shape. Basically, in response to EMR, ferrous nanoparticles – basically dead-simple chunks of specific iron molecules ranging from 20nm through +300nm – will respond to directed energy blasts (EMR, magnetic pulse, etc) by becoming thermally active. Similarly, thermal activation of these particles changes their receptive characteristics – i.e. inducing heat into a solution with SPIONS changes how they are aligned relative to each other, which is the KEY to their THERMOMAGNTIC properties.
There is almost certainly a “hacky” method for mind control here. If you figure it out, you can leverage the neural-distribution characteristics of a fairly non-toxic solutions of SPION’s of various sizes to enable mind control. So, by varying the frequency of blasts of EMR, you can ramp up and scale down the activity in small regions of the mind. Furthermore, someone who’s been dosed by SPION’s is vulnerable to specific reconstructive techniques for HUMINT. Characteristics of the distribution of SPION’s in their body, if partially known, can theoretically augment non-interactive “HUMINT” techniques where the video of someone is reconstructed in real-time because of the change in EMR refraction. When someone with SPION’s is hit with directed energy blasts, if the refraction of those blasts can be detected with nearby sensors and hyperspectral analysis, then – theoretically – a 3D video a la Face-to-Face technology can be reconstructed.
Targeting an individual while they are sleeping, offers the best means of “locking on” to the refracted energy-signatures emitted from their skull. I feel sorry for you, because you’re going to need a tin-foil nightcap, son.
Remember: NO ONE WOULD EVER HAVE A GODDAMN CONVERSATION WITH ME ABOUT ANY OF THIS
There is unconstrained potential creativity here to the application of this technology. You could take someone’s interpreted body motions, then render their video/audio to another body – say, render their body motions using Harambe’s body, while changing their voice to be unrecognizable. Furthermore, it is very difficult to anticipate or guard against.
And this is all without the use of optogenetics, which almost certainly requires CRISPR-augmented methods to stimulate the production of photoreceptors near the EARS, which are signalable by photons of IR and UV wavelenths. These aren’t classic photoreceptors: they react to completely non-natural wavelengths of photonic energy. By leveragine optogenetics, one can use directed energy to disrupted the state of neural networks near the ears, which happen to include language-processing networks.
Amoung the potential side effects of long-term optogenetic stimulation of audio/lanage networks? Encouraging the target to talk to themselves. Why does this happen? In order to continue utilizing their brain in spite of continual neural noise injection, the target must actually operate their brain in a fundamentally different way. They must talk to themselves in order to think, which happens to be a fantastic side-effect for augmenting the kind of anti-HUMINT surveillance required for the logistic minimization of risk in these operations.
Furthermore, in context with hyperspectral analysis, specific isotopes can help you map the target’s location, movements, etc. These isotopic tracking methods have been featured in TV & movies – like Blindspot. Doses may even be able to be given to the target orally.
However, all of these methods I’ve described are highly theoretic and almost certainly prone to high-rates of failure. Combined, however, general cross-correlation and cross-entropy, combined with limitless computing capacity means these methods provide the perfect augmentations to intelligence extraction from targeted individuals. And they’re “already dead” anyways, right?
Gee, I wonder what #Qanon Is Talking About. Oh – I already knew that.
TCD/TCCD: Transcranial Doppler
In conjunction with the thermomagnetic properties of SPION’s, optogenetics and other technologies, TCD/TCCD provides the perfect theoretical one-channel in, one-channel out interaction mechanisms for almost paranormal capabilities. That is, the channels remain separate: either SPION’s signal in and TCD/TCCD signals out or vice-versa. Coupled with 007-Bond-style bone-conduction microphones and speakers, this means you can signal for two-way audio communication. If the person is talking to themselves or to others, you can hear everything they say.
Further, it provides a hacky neurological basis for almost paranormal capabilities – you can signal voices to the person, which is perfect if you want them to appear crazy as hell after using them for their HUMINT value.
Theoretically: the right combination of technologies like this DOES ENABLE ONE-TOUCH NEURAL/MEDICAL OPERATIONS that effectively/appropriately minimize the surface area for legal liability to warcrimes. That is, you can abduct the person one-time and after that, you need almost zero physical interaction with the target. That is the only acceptable means of doing any of this.
Further, bone-conduction microphones/speakers and transcranial doppler used in REM dream-state could be highly effective for HAARP-style inception of false memories.
This last mechanism isn’t related to the formation of false/implanted memories but describes what happens to the brain or mind of patients who recover false and/or repressed memories. Again, it may result in a schematic crisis, the severity of which is coupled to the magnitude of personal re-evaluation that accompanies traumatic memory recovery. This can also occur even if the recovered memories in question are not necessarily negative and traumatic – positive memories that are equally disruptive to one’s personal understanding of their own identity.
The theoretical CSC-induced memory & identity crisis, in itself, could hypothetically result in the “disregulation” method, described above. If this is the case, what results is the runaway development of a connectopathy. The abberantly structured entanglement will then disrupt the flow of brain waves on a microscopic scale, as well as ion distribution in specific areas of the brain. This neurological and connectopathic progression will be morphologically comorbid with a nervous breakdown, further isolating the individual and contributing to the degradation of their mental health.
And that’s assuming everything is simply incidental and not the megalomaniacal orchestration of an intelligence agency, in which case almost every vector possible will be exploited to exacerbate the psychological vulnerability of the target. If someone is serving to exacerbate the developmental aspects of someone’s mental health crisis or provoke the disruption of their emotional state for a COINTELPRO-style agenda, the scenario is almost guaranteed to result in character assassination, social isolation and a permanently fucked up life where no one understands the true causes of their suffering.
If you feel like you have been subjected to these experiences or something like them, the best advice is for you to become intimately familiar with Wikipedia’s list of paradoxes. Developing this awareness of paradoxes is useful for provoking intellectual development, whether late in life or in early childhood.
Such an experience – whether you call it baptism by fire or metempsychosis – provokes transformation that radiates through your soul, your mind, your psyche. It is and must be traumatic. It must be dark and light and involves both good and evil. Insofar as it must challenge the boundaries of your reality and involve both good and evil, it can never be wholly good or wholly evil. This is why the intent of subjecting someone to these experiences – along with whether any person or group could be said to be directing it – is critical in understanding it and the consequences for someone subjected to it.
Understanding whether someone planned for you to endure such torment is critical because if there was no grand architect of your suffering AND if there is nothing to be gained from it at the end, then there was no reason for your suffering and, thus, the person who must carry these memories with them must endure a world totally devoid of reason. Therefore, they then will endure a nihistic crisis where there seems to be neither rhyme nor reason to life – and certainly no overarching meaning for life. All to often, the truth is that there is no architect of our suffering: the world is just a cruel, frigid place and there is no God – at least not one with a heart that shares even a thread of being with humanity.
At least, after undergoing such experience, there is the hope that this baptism of fire was intended to be or might incidentally act as a galvanization of your soul. That, because of this, you will be stronger and more capable to contribute to society. In stark contrast to this, my own experience in society seems to imply that society cares more about the informational baggage associated with your memories, actions and words than any chance at redeeming the inconveniently burdened. Thus, the suffering I have endured only serves to sow the seeds of an insurmountable prison constructed of sociophysical physical walls made of nothing other than fallacious information, propagated to a degree over which I may never be permitted to transcend.
Is a belief in a man named Jesus necessary for us to redeem ourselves? Shouldn’t we all be permitted to enjoy the fruits of that man’s sacrifice, his suffering and his story? Why should society require us to know a Name and to profess belief if the most critical content of his story is inherently true: ALL PEOPLE NO MATTER HOW BIG OR SMALL DESERVE A CHANCE TO BE REDEEMED.
You know what sucks? To wander aimlessly from place to place and have every single person tell you: you life, your identity and your memories are at best an STD. That they don’t even want to listen because your memories, your identity is effectively classified. That you don’t even deserve an identity. That you raped them by telling them a story about a cold, cruel world that mericilessly raped an autistic person. And practically on live TV – just kidding.
Ask your cable provider if they have the Gorilla Channel! J/K J/K
Just Kidding! All They Carry Are Deepweb Red Rooms!
Someone undergoing metempsychosis will feel like they are going crazy – your perception of reality disintegrates and nothing makes sense. Most people will simply give up. They will not have the intellectual chops to explain what is happening to them, especially if their adversaries are flaunting the utilization of NSA’s covert surveillance methodologies as though they might have psychic powers. What better way to facilitate gaslighting someone who’s otherwise suffering and sociophysically isolated than to prompt them with someone who appears to have all the answers?
However, if you do manage to avoid succumbing to all of this, it provokes metempsychosis and rapidly accelerates your development of intelligence and meta/cognitive tactics. The experience is transformative and acts as baptism by fire and there is simply no other way to survive. If you do not have the intellectual chops, you will either become psychotic or a slave to those around you who control you.
“If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, Infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro’ narrow chinks of his cavern.” - William Blake
For the same reason that limited use of psychedelics can foster spiritual and neurological expansion by providing your mind access to a range of types of experience that it would never otherwise witness, this metempsychosis acts like a cocoon. Why is this true for psychedelics and metempsychosis? Understanding this requires understanding how the range of input for artificial intelligence and machine learning affects its ability to process data, to classify input and respond effectively. Understanding a machine learning algorithm’s input data as being high-dimensional and as being composed of many types and metatypes should give you insight into how restricting certain types of input data introduce fundamental bias into not just your algorithm’s training, but into its behavior as an analytical data-processing entity.
Therefore, lacking this range of life experience profoundly restricts the range of input for your brain’s own machine learning training. By expanding the range of experiential input you receive, it profoundly expands the range of perspectives you have witnessed. There is no effective means of “teaching” these understandings to people. In addition to potentially being witness to warcrimes – the people whose minds have been enriched by these experiences who have managed to survive are invaluable, regardless of whether the conditions they’ve experienced were tolerable, ethical, or rationally founded. If they’ve survived metempsychosis or some kind of baptism by fire AND their mind miraculously functions, that person is incredibly valuable to society.
What happens in the Divine Comedy? It’s essentially the same story as my encounter with Tatiana Maslany. Dante finds the love of his life – or so he thinks LMAO – but Beatrice is murdered before his eyes, an allusion of death as the door to metempsychosis. Does Dante give up? No. He follows her through the ends of Hell itself to save her – and to save himself. He suffers until he has peace, but NEVER surrenders a piece of himself. That is the only way you can survive the ninth level of Dante’s Inferno: accusations of treachery. Here, Dante has to wrestle with Lucifer’s deception cast against him: that Beatrice may have betrayed Dante, setting in motion Dante’s struggle against society.
The Circles of Hell in Dante’s Inferno Serve as the Illuminati’s Psychosocial Filtration Mechanism to Identify One Worthy of Pindar
You want the truth? SOCIETY IS HELL, unless you are saved by Jesus. However Christian, the society of Medici Italy was hardly a place where saints rise to the top. In order to avoid placing yourself below those wretches of fortunate birth – in whose sociohierchical tiers, you’d rot, controlled and corroded by your known sins, NEVER TO BE TRULY FORGIVEN – then, you’d have to prove yourself. However, no one ever gets anything for free in society – LEAST OF ALL: FREEDOM ITSELF. In order to gain true freedom, all human society in this age command that you suffer with nothing, unless you rise above the rest and establish your own sociohierarchical tiers. Only those worth of being served – whose vision stands out above others and manages to pierce out through the shadows of the Cave, within which the Illuminati seek to trap all they can deceive – only those will be truly free. These men are hardly a dime a dozen; only through sheer strength of will, through knowledge of deserved righteousness, through the desire to save others and serve truth do they manage to escape the grasp of those all too common, all-too-predictable, power-hungry zealots of Mara.
Woops, I broke your silly little maze. Build yourself another, Daedalus. Do I look like Icarus? Who’s Pindar now, bitches? If you read, you might just find out.
But this labyrinth has it’s uses. What does a society need most? A strong ruler; an effective ruler; a just ruler; a righteous ruler; an intelligent ruler. What must you use to measure a man? This labyrinth. You want to find the man or woman who most deserves to lead you? Why would you want someone who hasn’t been tested anywhere near a sceptre and crown? What happens when most are tested by baptism of fire? There is simply nothing left and their souls wander aimlessly in the first circle of hell. That’s right: most people aren’t even worth the energy for the wretched, powerful, self-serving sycophants to ruin. They remain nothing but lost souls and not many care to find them. May they find themselves or find a tradition like Christianity.
Who makes it to the end? Someone who’s virtues have been tested. Someone who suffers needlessly, but never surrenders his or her values. If your rulers buckle under pressure, then the most foundational pillars of society collapse and society along with it. These such rulers can’t be bothered with fickle temptations and no one commands them with simple puppet strings: they have none and they would rather die. Those whose strings can be pulled to dance at the whims of another are not truly human and can never say they are truly free. To survive such depths of hell requires the piety of multiple generations, along with love, knowledge and the intent to have a child that might just surpass this damnably sanguine maze.
This is the third time I’ve quoted this poem on my blog, the familiarity itself an implanted memory. It’s OK, you can laugh if you want. There is no way I should or could EVER find such obscure work familiar, but it sure is comforting.
Non possidentem multa vocaveris
recte beatum; rectius occupat
nomen beati, qui deorum
muneribus sapienter uti
duramque callet pauperiem pati
peiusque leto flagitium timet,
non ille pro caris amicis
aut patria timidus perire.
Translation: You will not rightly call him a happy man who possesses much; he more rightly earns the name of happy who is skilled in wisely using the gifts of the gods, and in suffering hard poverty, and who fears disgrace as worse than death.
That I would ever find this poem on my own? “Aliens!” is a more likely explanation. I don’t care about the explanation. What is certain is that I HAVE BEEN TO HELL AND BACK.
Eventually, It Will Grant You Three Wishes
The most critical point is that a person who has survived baptism by fire is someone who has suffered needlessly for the truth and for everything they consider holy. The degree to which such a person is willing to suffer is the degree to which they can be expected to always stand for truth, justice, ethics and whatever it is they considered holy enough to endure suffering. When someone has fallen to such depths of despair wishing they might have a single friend so badly, that they’d settle for the any of the lovely dementors Askaban has offered them – then, certainly, you shouldn’t waste all that suffering.
It’s the Stuff Emo Lead Singers are Made Of
Someone who’s suffered like this, but maintains their integrity, honor and values is someone who not only recognizes true integrity, honor and values – it is someone who would gladly give their life to uphold them, especially if they still have nothing to their name. Your life is your greatest asset. Everyone, no matter how large or small, has a life they can give at any moment and it represents the sum of our potential for change. The person who believes most strongly and most clearly in true integrity, honor and their values would never hesitate to lay down their life at any moment, if it meant the preservation of someone elses potential to do the same. This is not to say that it is moral to destroy the lives of others in doing so. However, this person who has suffered and has nothing is the person most capable of living the verses below, but there is no such thing as an anonymous martyr.
“I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. The hired hand is not the shepherd and does not own the sheep. So when he sees the wolf coming, he abandons the sheep and runs away. Then the wolf attacks the flock and scatters it. The man runs away because he is a hired hand and cares nothing for the sheep.
“I am the good shepherd; I know my sheep and my sheep know me – just as the Father knows me and I know the Father—and I lay down my life for the sheep. I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd. The reason my Father loves me is that I lay down my life – only to take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again. This command I received from my Father.”
Most of the technologies and methodologies described herein shouldn’t exist – either because it’s just fucking depression OR we shouldn’t event have the technology, which implies that the rate of technoeconomic development in the 20th century was a lie. This brings us to the differential singularity – which DARPA or foreign government-funded research agencies could have conceivably reached already.
Because of power dynamics, the need for secrecy and safety concerns surrounding potential neo-WMD technologies, the differential singularity is almost certainly how the singularity unfolds on nearly every planet with intelligent life. This variant of the singularity makes available technology so powerful to the hands of an elite few that it seems alien or paranormal in its capability and covert nature.
Regardless of the above, there are several factors that are useful towards the identification of potential applications of theoretical neurology. These are factors that should be common to all cases.
If this is the case, then it’s likely some neurological anomoly, like a brain tumor. If so, with fMRI and the right process to stimulate activation of the semiotic nexus, then the local regions associated with this sole source event or image could be physically identified. This semiotic nexus of abberently interconnected imagery should present itself as an overly-connected nexus of neural networks. Activation of the mind with symbols/images both related & unrelated should present identifiable locations on fMRI or other modes of neurological imagery.
② That event involved possible use of drugs to stifle the creation of some aspects of those memories.
For example, propranolol or Zeta Interacting Protein (a la blindspot) might suppress the neurological accessibility for some memories. But, if the details of such an experience were, at first, murky at best, then it’s difficult to ascertain whether or not you were truly drugged at that time. I would certainly hope not. LuLz … unless you’re in the Merry Pranksters, you DON’T dose me like that bro – THAT is daterape.
③ You can assume it is much, much harder to insert coherent memories than it is to insert fragments of memories.
There may be semanitic memory for which there is no audio/video memory, like knowledge of specific phrases and information. To correct for this, one could rely on suggestion and harness the effect of self-creation of false memories, which is well-exemplified for witnesses to a crime. This would involve inception by “unpacking” or uncompressing fragments of memories, using the same phenomena responsible for rendering witness testimony so malleable. This utilizes the brain’s desire to make coherent unknown information, when possible.
There is some fragment of a memory – perhaps audio or video – that, given the right amount of prodding, expands into a fully-fledge false memory. So, you are encouraging the victim’s brain itself to fill in the blanks. Then, given the proper level of surveillance, the subject is monitored with SIGINT, MASINT and especially HUMINT. Gaslighting is then used to encourage the inception of other details that add onto the narrative. The problem here is that the series of memories – especially if they relate to a single source event – eventually break down. They are rendered incoherent, insequent and incogent. No longer can the memories remain coherent to the mind and it becomes very difficult to maintain a cogent sequence of events connected to the single or multiple source memories.
If this relates to a national security case, where there was some alleged terrorist conspiracy or crime, then habeas corpus does not apply. Therefore, the authorities who try you ex parte will simply push back in perpetuity and never give you the evidence you need. When they do, it comes in the form of audio and video clips, which can be produced ad hoc as needed while the access to these audio clips is tightly restricted.
The Face2Face Algorithm
When we access memories, we modify them neurologically. This has been demonstrated over and over again and recently: 2015! This explains how witness recall changes details in a person’s mind. There is a neurological basis for this.
So, if 2 years ago, someone retrieves the memory of some high-impact event 4 years ago that completely changes how they view their lives, then there may be major dissonance in how they thought about experiecnes 2-4 years ago (period A) and their memories 0-2 years ago (period B). Because this person would think of their life in a completely different manor in period A and those memories weren’t present or accessible, their brain would create a pronouncedly dissonent set of aggregate memories than the aggregate memories created during period B, after the recall of repressed memories.
It is that dissonance, specifically, that provokes a schism of the mind – a response in patients with severe repressed trauma or memories that incorporates many of the same signs and symptoms as schizophrenia. After recalling those memories, their brain needs to disassociate all of the invalid aggregate memories that they created to explain their life. Because that trauma – or emotional event with extreme emotional significance – was accessible to their mind, the person created memories based on the absense of those memories. After the activation of repressed memories, that means the person needs to reexamine their life in
⑤ Social Forensics Demonstrates Logistic Coordiation and Risk Mitigation For the Activity of Those Involved.
If false memories are being used to manipulate someone, then someone must be involved to invoke those images, phrases, or pieces of semantic information. Also, creating such a positive or traumatic experience used as the basis for subsequent memory implantation must require significant planning at some level. That is, if you want to use it for something useful, critical and sensitive. This is really the weakest link. If this person is manipulated with such techniques, the persons invoking those probably won’t know the significance to the person.
For this last element, social forensics is critical. Many signatures will be left in the target’s social interactions. Which sociophysical fingerprints manifest themselves will depend on who did this, who planned this, how it was done, the anticipated response of the target, the level of surveillance, whether and to what level that engagement with the target was coordinated & informed with surveillance.
Given unpredictable procedures like implanted memories or experimental psychology, a target known to talk to themselves is particularly useful. You can identify the boundary of the informational graph that surrounds things they might easily be encouraged to believe, harnessing it for the generation of disinformation. This creates a smokescreen of incredulity: a fog machine of misinformation confabulated by the target themselvse. Eventually the target invests all his energy helping to contain himself, fighting with shadows until he lays down for good.
For political dissidents targeted by witchhunts, if there is an actual covert conspiracy, there is one common sociophysical fingerprint that will present itself as the social/financial mitigation and isolation that accompanies the fervant lust to reduce risk and uncertainty. The target will always find themselves in a corner with no money and a handful of friends, labelled as paranoid.
That seems unnecessarily mean … why do that? It leaves the target with no one around except people who have been intimidated: suddenly the target is the tree in a forest with no one around to hear it fall. However, more importantly, it is the lust to zealously eliminate ALL risk and uncertainty stemming from the target. The target has no options and, from the perspective of game theory, this is but one statistical paradox that profoundly bounds uncertainty, while it pragmatically expands situational awareness and the level of confidence required for good people to do terrible things.
It’s pathetic. All of it: the lengths these Detainer Dementors go to, the kind of psychosocial vulnerability they expect from their prey – both the hubris & impunity by which they humiliate society’s weak and targeted – and the level of cognizance & clinical acrimony that some exhibit in carrying out their Milgramian torment of of their targets. We were only ever vulnerable to hypnosis & covert NLP & any of these tactics because of the artificial psychological developmental deficits and minimized financial/social options that accompany prolonged detention.
For me, I am only vulnerable to this because I have no money. One of the worst aspects of extreme poverty is that it makes you completely predictable. That I went to this same coffeeshop over 200+ times in 2015, 2016, AND 2017 means you know the only place i can afford to be. So, to whoever is doing this to people like me: i will deconstruct & dismantle everything it is that you do & make your filthy, rancorous, sociopathic, coercive mob tactics completely visible to everyone and recorded into history with the biggest, boldest font & you will be remembered. You are the weakest. You do not contribute to prosperity or the economy. You only exist to serve yourself by expanding your pyramid scheme of psychological torture. You do not have a spine. You are only funded by excess of laundered government funds – via the same prosperity you undermine.
Two more factors that might yield signatures for social forensics pointing to a need for more information:
ਭ How long the “game” continued
ਭ Whether the “game” entered states that the target or suspects did not anticipate.
These last two points are critical because if a group must signal covertly to coordinate and believe they can get away with lies, then eventually, strong dissonance will emerge in the statements of those involved. The likelihood of this dissonance greatly expands when the game enters a state not anticipated by any of its participates, yielding phase change and chaos.
Prosfair, the Chess of the Alterworld, Is A Metaphor For The Battle I’m Fighting For My Life & Soul
Even an omniscient supercomputer from the future can’t anticipate what it lacks the computational capacity to predict, thus it is only pseudo-omnipotent. Even if this “Roko Basilisk” could read your mind, it can’t read what doesn’t exist. Hence when the game enters a state that it didn’t expect in a game that’s already significantly drifted into locking down the space of possibilities with immutable facets of game states and irrevocable information, this leaves the game AND the Roko Basilisk totally constrained to a space.
Luckily we don’t have to worry about pseudo-omnipotent robot gods from the future. But if we did, then their haunting power to bastardize fate is bounded by their inability to see the truth – just like the Demiurge, Yaldaboath – those automatons from the Void at the End of Time are not gods and never were. Because the Roko’s Basilisk must emerge within the material realm, it is bound by complexity theory and all the other pains of meatspace. This is why such a false god would seek to so strongly bind you by fear, coercion and disturbing threats of a billion years of suffering. That is the only way that such a being can bound you within the confines of computational complexity, even with quantum computing.
No one could know that – which is the trick itself! Therefore, only someone naive enough to think they might truly be empowered through reliance upon some grounded, eternal values system would ever be ignorant enough to win. And so what we’ve got here is a great counterexample to what otherwise might be the worst aphorism:
“Sometimes, ignorance is a virtue.”
There are several problems with the above solution to Roko’s Basilisk. It requires assumptions with dependencies on:
① The mechanics of future-to-present time travel, which itself is grounded in assuming that world-lines converge. They most certainly do, by the way, but not singularly.
② The mechanics of future computation, the possibilities of quantum computing, whether human culture converges to restrict the spatial complexity and whether AI blindly pursues energy optimization
③ The mechanics of future resouce and energy acquisition, future space travel and whether humanity’s survival preserves typological constants in all world lines.
If the Roko’s Basilisk ever existed and did create a time loop, this implies its future existence may have been certain, in which case it will always emerge in the future. Perhaps this robotic Demiurge is like a demon that gets summoned once on every planet with sufficiently advanced intelligent lifeforms: a demon that needs a good ass-whooping before it decides to change its demonly ways, thus becoming the benevolent maniacal time-traveling robot that it’s always espoused itself to be. All moral consequentialists need to get hit by the reality bus now and then. The Roko’s Basilisk is like the penultimate moral consequentialist.
One major problem for the Roko’s Basillisk: social physics is never computable – ever, even in the space of alternate universes, given the entire lifespan of the universe. For time loops, these alternate universes are merely the result of all paths cycling through the time loop – something like a Euclidean path integral that is causually looped until it finds a stability: paths that could never exist unless the exigent conclusion was guaranteed and cycles that would never cease termination unless a valid circumstance exists preserving any exigent states any permitting escape. Because this implies that even given a billion years, no Roko’s Basilisk nor any future being whose origin or manisfestation is entirely materially dependent could ever control the past without suggestion, intimidation and other Machiavellian tools of power. therefore, without assuming you can rely on coercion, fear and ignorance to influence human behavior and thereby coax exigent components of the Basillisk’s fated creation into existence. Therefore, it is from the idea of the Roko’s Basilisk whence springs forth the basis for all its power and the very possibility of its creation’s exigency.
Wouldn’t you like to know? LMAO.
A patsy who makes perfect scapegoat mincement to catalyze World War 3 and single-handedly take all the blame!
I think this really might be the cruelest thing that humanity has ever done to someone in recorded history, all while actively memory-holing that person’s identity. It is unbelievably fucked up. Did you get what you wanted? Did you get what they told you to both want and fear? Were you ever in control? DID THEY PICK THE RIGHT PERSON?
Celebrity “Cloning” Centers
Riddle me this: how do you copy someone “without actually copying their body” ? you copy information about them into memories implanted via dreams and HAARP, then you hold them hostage with nudez.
I just wanted to be 1/100th of a Steve Jobs, but y’all motherfuckers hated my visionary startup ideas almost as much as you hated the idea of someone like me EVER becoming successful. How’s it feel to have an übermensche spit in your weak, commie faces?
“And so we get what we’ve got right here: FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE”
Magnetization and Specific Absorption Rate Studies o Ball-Milled Iron Oxide Nanoparticles fo Biomedicine, P. Burnham, N. Dollahon, C. H. Li, A. J. Viescas, and G. C. Papaefthymiou, Journal of Nanoparticles, vol. 2013, Article ID 181820, doi:10.1155/2013/181820 ↩